n6sgbir14
Image225.jpg
New toy. Thank you, black friday.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/business/epaper/2005/11/23/a1d_officedepot_1123.html
Brim's Web site, www.bfads.net or www.bf2005.com, posts advance copies of advertisements for Black Friday, the nickname for one of the biggest shopping days of the year.
Brim, 18, is an electrical engineering student at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, Calif., according to published reports. He did not respond to interview requests Tuesday.
His is one of a handful of similar sites popping up to give holiday shoppers a sneak peek at upcoming sales. The elaborate circulars generally are distributed just a day or two ahead of the big day, but these sites post them days, even weeks, earlier. They presumably get leaked copies from employees or people involved in the ads' printing who don't have permission to distribute the ads.
Many retailers are furious, arguing that the sites hurt their holiday business. A few have taken legal action.
Home Depot, Sears and Kmart have taken steps to force Brim to remove their ads, according to published reports.
The concern is not about consumers seeing the ads early. Few are even paying attention, said Britt Beemer, chairman of America's Research Group, a consumer market research firm in Charleston, S.C.
This issue is other retailers.
"A retailer who's going to have some barn-burning price on Friday doesn't want his competitor to know about it," Beemer said. "Some retailers are breathing fire over it."
In its suit, Office Depot said the ads are confidential trade secrets. The early release tips off competitors on the company's sales, giving them time to adjust their prices.
Dear Retailer,
If an 18 year old can get an advance copy of your ad, why is it you think your competitors can't?
Come on, admit it. You're pissed about people's knowledge of future sales prices killing current prices on sales items….
Protected:
Image223.jpg
Please do not spray paint on any surface in the store
hehe
Protected:
From today's installment of "No TLA Left Behind"
The only remaining obstacle in putting the torture ban into law is the White House. The Vice President has already threatened an administration veto on the torture ban unless the CIA receives an exemption. This is unacceptable. We need to act now and show the White House that torture is not an American value and should never be the policy of the United States.
Message-Id: <LYRIS-33556665-88386-2005.11.16-18.08.13–paul#timmins.net@lists.democracyforamerica.com>
Democracy for America email, no linkable website for content
VICE PRESIDENT Cheney is aggressively pursuing an initiative that may be unprecedented for an elected official of the executive branch: He is proposing that Congress legally authorize human rights abuses by Americans. "Cruel, inhuman and degrading" treatment of prisoners is banned by an international treaty negotiated by the Reagan administration and ratified by the United States. The State Department annually issues a report criticizing other governments for violating it. Now Mr. Cheney is asking Congress to approve legal language that would allow the CIA to commit such abuses against foreign prisoners it is holding abroad. In other words, this vice president has become an open advocate of torture.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/25/AR2005102501388.html
WASHINGTON – Vice President
Dick Cheney made an unusual personal appeal to Republican senators this week to allow
CIA exemptions to a proposed ban on the torture of terror suspects in U.S. custody, according to participants in a closed-door session.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051104/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cheney_torture
Now, I've been told that it doesn't matter if we make it illegal here, the CIA will do whatever it wants anyway. Apparently, it matters a lot to Dick Cheney. If so, it means that it must have some actual level of pull. I don't even begin to pretend it will stop torture entirely, but when you turn on the lights, the roaches scatter. Some of them find hiding places, but you can kill a few of them, and it calls attention to the roach problem, rather than letting it take over and multiply and pretend it doesn't exist.
I'll leave you with a quote from a person I'm beginning to respect more and more with each coming day.
I want to emphasize to some of my friends who say that we should do anything that is necessary to extract intelligence, No. 1, torture doesn't work; No. 2, if extraneous or extraordinary actions have to be taken–and there may be cases, and we will get into this in the next amendment, where someone has information that it is believed poses an immediate threat to the United States–then I would suppose that it would be entirely appropriate, under law, that the President of the United States could make that judgment and take whatever actions are necessary. In the meantime, the Army Field Manual authorizes interrogation techniques that are proven effective in extracting lifesaving information from the most hardened prisoners. It also recognizes that torture and cruel treatment are ineffective methods because they induce prisoners to say what their interrogators want to hear, even if it is not true.
It is consistent with our laws and, most importantly, our values. Our values are different from those of our enemies. When colleagues or others may come on this floor and say: Well, they do it, others do it, al-Qaida does it, other nations in the world do it, what differentiates us, the United States of America, from other countries is the fact that we do not. We do not abuse human rights. We do not do it. I would argue the pictures, terrible pictures from Abu Ghraib, harmed us–not only in the Arab world, which is an area of great concern but it also harmed us dramatically amongst friendly nations, the Europeans, many of our allies.
-Sen. McCain, July 25, 2005
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?r109:./temp/~r109U3ElaN
Image222.jpg
blue!



